I agree. Moncrief has never proven anything of value in the NFL. Thielan, while aging for a dynasty roster, still has plenty of wr1-2 range for the next few years. The 2nd rounders are a personal preference. Some people like the upside of rookies, others dislike the downside of unproven players.
I might not even accept the trade for moncrief and both 2’s, but you would have me think about it.
You got a guy who hasn’t really produced, and is on a new team where he could be the 2, but also could be the 4. The late second could be valuable if you need a QB or TE, but if not it’s very worth it to ship that with a meh maybe guy for a legit 2 on a high powered potential offense. Only thing that will hurt Thailands production, is if they are so damn good that they dont need to throw. I still take thielen
Hard to say without knowing you roster and league, but if he bites on 2.08 / 2.12 / Bryant / Moncrief or Enunwa I would make that trade. To me, it is much in your favor. I would not give up A. Collins IMHO. Again, your league might have different values but I think his upside is really high.
Moving Bryant / Moncrief or Enunwa and hope for a guy that has shown to be good (I am not willing to say stud despite other forecasts), that is worth it to make line-up decisions easier. Despite Theilen being older, I think he has enough left to keep dynasty value the next 3 years at least.
I agree with fun4willis. I would consider the Moncrief & late 2nds offer almost offensive. I’m surprised so many foot clan members think Collins, Martavis, & 2.08 is an overpay and Moncrief + any number of late 2nds is fair as much as the guys sing “hooked on a Thielen”.
Collins is probably solid but Dixon may still emerge. Martavis is talented but disappeared even when on the field last year and people seem to have forgotten he’s had the year long suspension and is one bad decision from maybe never playing again. Accept his offer and take Thielen + a FA/waiver pickup.