‹ Main Site Forums Home My Account

Dynasty trade rookie 1.02?


#1

Should I trade jerrick mckinnon and the 1.10 for the 1.02?


#2

No. You’re basically trading a starting RB and like a potential top WR or later RB prospect for Guice.

Not worth it IMO. In most startups, McKinnon alone goes before Guice.


#3

I messed up the question. But at 1.02 i could get rashaad penny or sony michel.


#4

Doesn’t matter who you can get. You can probably get more for Mckinnon if you traded given all the hype around him right now. Doesn’t make sense to add McKinnon and a 1.10 for the 1.02.

If you really want the 1.02 that bad, just do the trade straight up McKinnon for 1.02.


#5

noted. would that be worth it? I have the 1.01


#6

Oh you have the 1.01 too? Damn must be nice. Yeah I’d do the trade straight up. Or if they really push, can add a 2nd or something but def wouldn’t do McKinnon + 1st.


#7

Shit. I did a terrible job explaining. but the point is clear. thanks


#8

I kept mckinnon and traded my 2.03 and 2.10 rookie pick for 1.03. should I take sony or derrius?


#9

Guice is the safer play


#10

Wow - you’ll get Barkley, Guice (safer I think).
AND you Get to keep McKinnon.
PLUS, If i read it correctly, you still have the 1.10 - Might be able to get Moore, Ridley or Gallup there to get a top rookie WR.
Great job!


#11

You landed the 1.03 for the 2.03 and 2.10? Leagues like this would frustrate me to be in. In no universe is that a fair deal.


#13

It did seem to frustrate my opponents but the guy I made the trade with has gone on record talking mess about the rookie running backs who aren’t named barkley. I guess he has prospects in the second that he prefers.


#14

I would definitely trade McKinnon and 1.10 for 1.02 in a heart beat, and I’d definitely take Guice at 1.02. I’m firmly in sell McKinnon now camp.