Okay, so this conversation started about where a player is BEING taken in drafts, not where the experts say he SHOULD go in drafts. Therefore we reference ADP to see where people are taking him. ECR is a non factor when it comes to referencing where people are ACTUALLY going in drafts. I feel some wires got crossed there. And I know the stupid ESPN mock is unrealistic and probably a bad example, but the point was to show that you can get a quality team by taking receivers early and not feel like you HAVE to take a lower tier RB in the first two rounds. A strategy which includes comparing ADP to ECR to get the greatest value for where you are drafting.
Oh, and in case you missed it, non of the ADP’s I referenced were from ESPN or Yahoo.
Seriously, WE AGREE ABOUT WHERE OBJ SHOULD BE TAKEN!! But if you can’t agree that there will be some leagues, “competitive” and not, where he will fall to the 1.11/1.12, then we are done here. That’s the only point I’ve been trying to make this whole time.
And just so we’re on the same page as to what competitive is: people who play fantasy football seriously, do research, play to win, that don’t necessarily all have the same opinion, and that have fun doing it!